نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the people who methodically criticizes hadith is Sayyid Morteza. In one of his works, "Al-Rad 'Ala hadith e al-'Add", he criticizes the companions of the number (the 30 days of Ramadan) and reviews hadiths that consider Ramadan to be complete for 30 days (without any shortcomings). By criticizing these hadiths, Al-Sayyid Murtaza considers the end of Ramadan correct with the sight of the crescent moon (whether 29 days or 30 days). In criticizing hadiths cited by the companions of the number using different methods such as: reasoning for consensus and citing verses (Baqara/189/ 189 and Yunus/5) proves that their speech is discredited, he considers the analogy which is cited by the companions of the number as lacking in ijjat and according to the word science, he criticizes the hadiths cited by them. Also, al-Sayyid Murtaza considers the hadiths cited by them to be against the famous news and historical traditions of Muslims. Seyed Morteza's methods and criteria in criticizing the views of the number are exclusive only in the form of textual criticism and do not deal with documentary criticism. The method of collecting materials in this research is library and the research method is descriptive-analytical.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)