نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 فارغ التحصیل گروه فقه، دانشکده الهیات، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
2 پژوهشگر پسا دکتری علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد(پژوهشگر بنیاد پژوهشهای آستان قدس رضوی) ، شماره تماس: 09142353876، reza.mollazadehyamchi@alumni.um.ac.ir
3 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد جیرفت،
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Verse 34 of Surah At-Tawbah, with its emphatic prohibition against hoarding wealth, became a fundamental nexus in Islamic economic thought from the very beginning of Islam. This research goes beyond historical accounts to dissect the dispute between Abu Dharr al-Ghifari and the ruling authority concerning this verse. Its aim is to re-read this conflict not merely as the convergence of two rival economic paradigms, but also as a political battle over interpretive authority. The present study, employing a documentary method and an analytical-comparative approach, reconstructs the inferential reasoning of these two worldviews based on primary exegetical and narrative texts. The findings indicate that the ruling authority's "Conditional Permissibility Paradigm," by offering a duty-oriented definition of "kanz" (wealth on which zakat has not been paid), represented a jurisprudence focused on individual rights and political stability. In contrast, Abu Dharr's "Distributive Justice Paradigm," with its reading based on the psycho-ethical pathology of wealth hoarding and its social consequences (wealth beyond need), established a jurisprudence centered on public interest and distributive justice. Finally, this article introduces "Governmental Conditionality Theory" as a third reading, providing an analytical framework for understanding the dialectical capacity of Islamic jurisprudence to balance the two values of "property rights" and "social justice" based on the exigencies of the time.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)